Quanten.de Diskussionsforum

Quanten.de Diskussionsforum (http://www.quanten.de/forum/index.php5)
-   Theorien jenseits der Standardphysik (http://www.quanten.de/forum/forumdisplay.php5?f=4)
-   -   Combining the theories of Kaluza-Klein and Dr Randall Mills (http://www.quanten.de/forum/showthread.php5?t=3358)

lkcl 17.06.18 14:16

AW: Combining the theories of Kaluza-Klein and Dr Randall Mills
 
Zitat:

Zitat von Bernhard (Beitrag 87790)
Do you have a link to this work?

https://brilliantlightpower.com/book...and-streaming/

i must apologise, it is extremely large. a summary of the key strategic parts of the maths (which later chapters explain) starts on page 22.

some independent verification is underway (independent reproduction of the maths) and consequently includes some commentary that may prove useful, i kept a brief record here http://erm.lkcl.net/ under the section "GUTCP Verification".

if you have questions do ask.

also there was a DoD-funded group in the US that researched ball lightning and plasma balls back in the 1960s, the work was finally de-classified and shows startlingly similar equations based on the hypothesis that photons (or high-energy plasma particles) end up trapped in standing-wave circular loops and that the current distribution is perfectly spherical. i have a copy of the paper and can make it available on request.

lkcl 29.10.18 14:27

AW: Combining the theories of Kaluza-Klein and Dr Randall Mills
 
Zitat:

Zitat von Bernhard (Beitrag 87794)
Die Schriften von Jay R. Yablon sind zumindest einen Blick wert, wie die folgenden zwei Links zeigen:
https://jayryablon.wordpress.com/
https://jayryablon.files.wordpress.c...auza-klein.pdf

Das pdf enthält eine übersichtliche Darstellung des Kaluza-Klein-Modells.

Zum Autor gibt es hier ein paar Informationen:
https://jayryablon.wordpress.com/200...hysics-weblog/
https://jayryablon.wordpress.com/about-the-author/
Es handelt sich also um einen Patentanwalt, der mal Physik studiert hat.

yes, jay's work is fantastic, and extremely clear. it's long, it's detailed, yet at every step he outlines precisely what he is doing, what the reasoning is, and why he is doing it. he then moves on to the next step.

this is *NOT* a standard "scientific" approach. most scientific papers are written so as to assume that the reader is so knowledgeable that they do not require actual explanations, at all. or, that their work is so cut-down to fit the journal publication requirements that even someone in their field cannot replicate the results.

jay has explored several areas where he pays particular and special attention to the sign of the equations, where most people in this field *ASSUME* that a negative sign is not possible, therefore it can be ignored.

his latest work is exploring whether time is a complex number, going back to first principles on kaluza-klein. absolutely amazing work.


Alle Zeitangaben in WEZ +1. Es ist jetzt 18:48 Uhr.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 (Deutsch)
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ScienceUp - Dr. Günter Sturm