Zitat:
Zitat von Timm
Did you check "Beyond the Standard Model Forum"?
|
perhaps in the past couple of years, they got the message at last that censoring people is not a good idea! thank you.
(edit: ah, no, they have not):
https://www.physicsforums.com/thread...osting.178075/
Zitat:
All threads in this forum are intended for discussion of the scientific content of well-researched models of physics beyond the Standard Model that have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Due to the speculative nature of the subject, not-yet-published papers uploaded to databases like ArXiv or presented at reputable conferences are also acceptable for discussion. (Note that references to such unreviewed sources remain unacceptable in the other subforums dedicated to more established areas of physics.) This forum may not be used to propose new ideas or personal theories. All threads of this nature that are started in this forum will be removed by Mentors.
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/thread...osting.178075/
|
so unfortunately, at 1750 pages containing 30 separate and distinct mathematically consistent well-written papers plus extensive appendices and tables, dr randall mill's work does not qualify under the censorship rules of the physicsforum.