Zitat:
Zitat von TomS
Ich sehe es eher als Weiterentwicklung von “Kopenhagen”.
|
Ja, so wird dieser Ansatz i.d.R. klassifiziert.
Wenn ich aber andererseits lese
Zitat:
There are three basic features.
First, there is the specification of a closed system at particular times by a series of events. An event is the specification of the properties of a system through a projection operator for the Hilbert subspace representing the property.
Second,the time development is stochastic, involving many histories. Though Griths relied on Schrodinger dynamics, he treated it as going from event to event, rather than as a foundation for unitary evolution of a system prior to measurement and collapse. The events could be stages in a uniform evolution, measurements, interaction with the environment, or a virtual interaction. At this stage there is no distinction between real and virtual processes. A history is a time- ordered sequence of events. It is represented by projectors on a tensor product of the Hilbert spaces of the events.
Third, a consistency condition is imposed on histories, or families of histories. Only those that may be assigned probabilities are given
a physical interpretation.
|
Es gibt also "Familien von Historien"; das erinnert (mich zumindest) schon etwas an die Verzweigungen in Everetts Viele Welten.
Aber es ist ein anspruchsvolles Thema; ich hatte gestern etwas recherchiert, aber nur Kopfschmerzen bekommen davon. Dieser Ansatz hat ja einen viel ambitionierteren Anspruch als Kopenhagen oder VWI.
---
Ich sollte die Quelle angeben:
MacKinnon, Edward (2009) The Consistent Histories Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4549/